International · The Washington Post
Hasan Piker Sues Conservative Commentator Scott Jennings for $72.5 Million Over Edited Footage
Photo: Wesley Tingey on Unsplash
Twitch streamer Hasan Piker filed a $72.5 million defamation lawsuit Tuesday against conservative political commentator Scott Jennings, alleging that Jennings falsely told his podcast listeners that Piker advocated for lynchings to resume in the United States. The lawsuit stems from an August podcast in which Mr. Jennings played a clip of Mr. Piker saying the country should go back to a "better time when lynchings were happening." The lawsuit said the clip of Mr. Piker clearly depicted him mocking another person's argument when shown in proper context, and Mr. Jennings was intentionally slandering the streamer.
Left-wing Twitch streamer Hasan Piker filed a $72.5 million defamation lawsuit Tuesday against conservative political commentator Scott Jennings, alleging that Jennings falsely told his podcast listeners that Piker advocated for lynchings to resume in the United States. The civil defamation suit filed Tuesday in a Washington, D.C., district court is asking for $72.5 million.
The lawsuit stems from an August podcast in which Mr. Jennings played a clip of Mr. Piker saying the country should go back to a "better time when lynchings were happening." Mr. Jennings, a frequent contributor on CNN, held up the clip to warn Black voters about Mr. Piker's supposed endorsement of the practice. According to Piker's complaint, the original clip used by Mr. Jennings came from an October 2024 livestream in which Mr. Piker commented on a debate between two Black political figures, one of whom was liberal and the other was conservative. The lawsuit said Mr. Piker was reacting sarcastically about the conservative participant wanting to bring back lynchings because the debater had criticized progressive prosecutors.
"Mr. Jennings did not merely mischaracterize something Mr. Piker said," the complaint reads. "He took a false, fabricated, and manipulated video of Mr. Piker, added a made-up quotation that Mr. Piker never uttered, and then made accusations that went beyond even what the manipulated footage purported to show." The video's fragmented excerpts from three different streams presented Piker's words without full context, and in some cases out of order. As such, it was misleading.
Piker's lawyers say they sent a letter to Jennings demanding a retraction, but Jennings never responded. This defamation case marks a significant legal escalation in the ongoing political tensions between left-wing and right-wing commentators in online media spaces.
Sources & credits
Original source: The Washington Post